Stanbridge v. Hammock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stanbridge v. Hammock

80 A.D.2d 559, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 559 (Stanbridge v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanbridge v. Hammock, 80 A.D.2d 559, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to (1) review appellant’s determination, made after a hearing, which revoked petitioner’s parole and (2) compel appellant to reinstate petitioner to parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 2, 1980, which granted the petition to the extent of annulling the determination and directing that a new final parole revocation hearing be held. Leave to appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Cohalan. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination confirmed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The determination of the Parole Board is supported by the record. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to (1) review appellant’s determination, made after a hearing, which revoked petitioner’s parole and (2) compel appellant to reinstate petitioner to parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 2, 1980, which granted the petition to the extent of annulling the determination and directing that a new final parole revocation hearing be held. Leave to appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Cohalan. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination confirmed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The determination of the Parole Board is supported by the record. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 559, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanbridge-v-hammock-nyappdiv-1981.