Stanbaugh v. San Luis Valley Land & Mining Co.

109 F. 1063, 47 C.C.A. 686, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 20, 1901·No. No. 1,551·Published

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Charles .1. Hughes, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Edward O. Wolcott, Joel F. Vaile, and C. W. Waterman, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to rule 23 (31 C. C. A. cxxvi., 90 Fed. cxxvi.), for failure to print the record, on motion of defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanbaugh v. San Luis Valley Land & Mining Co., 109 F. 1063, 47 C.C.A. 686, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301 (8th Cir. 1901).

109 F. 1063 (Stanbaugh v. San Luis Valley Land & Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.