Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts/Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. Dallas Fire Insurance Company/Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts
Opinion
Insurance Company, Appellants
Concrete Concepts, Appellees
On motion for rehearing, Stumph requests that we "clarify and/or further modify"
the district-court judgment to reflect an attorney's fee award of 33% of the damages awarded him
in the judgment as modified by our November 16, 2000, opinion and judgment. We express no
opinion as to whether the attorney's fees awarded by the district court can or should be modified,
see Arthur Anderson & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp., 945 S.W.2d 812 (Tex. 1997), and reverse
and remand this issue to the district court for further consideration.
Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Justices Jones, Kidd and Yeakel
Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed in Part; Reversed and Remanded in Part
Filed: December 21, 2000
Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts/Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. Dallas Fire Insurance Company/Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts (Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts/Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. Dallas Fire Insurance Company/Stan Stumph, D/B/A Concrete Concepts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.