Stamps v. McClelan

1 White & W. 408
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 1881
DocketNo. 739, Tex. L. J., vol. 4, p. 447
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 408 (Stamps v. McClelan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stamps v. McClelan, 1 White & W. 408 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 748. Affidavit in forma pauperis. The affidavit in forma pauperis to take the case on appeal to the county court was in these words, viz.: “In this cause comes the defendant, J. T. Stamps, and says he is desirous of appealing from the judgment rendered against him in the justice’s court of Gonzales county, in the above entitled cause, to the county court of ■ Gonzales county, on the 11th day of November, 1878. Defendant further says that he is unable to give the appeal bond as required by law in appealing to the county court; therefore he prays that this cause be appealed without bond, as he is unable to give a bond, which fact he hereto swears to. ” Held, the affidavit is not in compliance with the statute which entitles one to appeal who will make oath that “he is unable to give bond and security for costs, as may be required by law.” [2 Pas. Dig. art. 6180; Green v. Martin, 43 Tex. 653; Ewell v. Anderson, 49 Tex. 697.] The county court did not err in dismissing the appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Martin
43 Tex. 653 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)
Ewell v. Anderson
49 Tex. 697 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamps-v-mcclelan-texapp-1881.