Stamps v. . Irvine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Stamps v. . Irvine

9 N.C. 232

DecidedDecember 5, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.C. 232 (Stamps v. . Irvine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stamps v. . Irvine, 9 N.C. 232 (N.C. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

The case was submitted without argument. The execution binds the property in the hands of the defendant, and all others claiming under him, from the time that it bears teste. 1 Term, 729; 1 Salk., 320; 1 Ld. Ray, 252; 1 Comyn's, 35; 16 East, 278, note. I therefore think the rule for a new trial should be discharged.

BY THE COURT: No error.

Cited: Palmer v. Clarke, 13 N.C. 357; Deaver v. Rice, 20 N.C. 569;Harding v. Spivey, 30 N.C. 65. *Page 133

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The case was submitted without argument. The execution binds the property in the hands of the defendant, and all others claiming under him, from the time that it bears teste. 1 Term, 729; 1 Salk., 320; 1 Ld. Ray, 252; 1 Comyn's, 35; 16 East, 278, note. I therefore think the rule for a new trial should be discharged.

BY THE COURT: No error.

Cited: Palmer v. Clarke, 13 N.C. 357; Deaver v. Rice, 20 N.C. 569;Harding v. Spivey, 30 N.C. 65. *Page 133

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.C. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamps-v-irvine-nc-1822.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack