Stamps v. . Irvine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Stamps v. . Irvine

9 N.C. 232

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1822·Published

Opinion

The case was submitted without argument. The execution binds the property in the hands of the defendant, and all others claiming under him, from the time that it bears teste. 1 Term, 729; 1 Salk., 320; 1 Ld. Ray, 252; 1 Comyn's, 35; 16 East, 278, note. I therefore think the rule for a new trial should be discharged.

BY THE COURT: No error.

Cited: Palmer v. Clarke, 13 N.C. 357; Deaver v. Rice, 20 N.C. 569;Harding v. Spivey, 30 N.C. 65. *Page 133

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The case was submitted without argument. The execution binds the property in the hands of the defendant, and all others claiming under him, from the time that it bears teste. 1 Term, 729; 1 Salk., 320; 1 Ld. Ray, 252; 1 Comyn's, 35; 16 East, 278, note. I therefore think the rule for a new trial should be discharged.

BY THE COURT: No error.

Cited: Palmer v. Clarke, 13 N.C. 357; Deaver v. Rice, 20 N.C. 569;Harding v. Spivey, 30 N.C. 65. *Page 133

Stamps v. . Irvine, 9 N.C. 232 (N.C. 1822).

Pincite

9 N.C. 232 (Stamps v. . Irvine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related