Stamo v. Wiener
This text of 101 N.E.2d 379 (Stamo v. Wiener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. This is an action at law to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while being driven home from his place of employment by the defendant, his employer. The transportation was one of the terms of his employment. The defendant was insured under the workmen’s compensation act (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 152), and the plaintiff did not reserve under § 24, as amended, of the act any rights at common law. Caira v. Caira, 296 Mass. 448, 449. DeStefano v. Alpha Lunch Co. of Boston, 308 Mass. 38, 40. Murphy v. Miet-tinen, 317 Mass. 633. Adiletto v. Brockton Cut Sole Corp. 322 Mass. 110, 113. Pell v. New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co. 325 Mass. 239, 241.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 N.E.2d 379, 328 Mass. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamo-v-wiener-mass-1951.