Stamm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stamm v. State

270 So. 3d 558

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 2019

DocketNo. 1D18-1009

StatusPublished

This text of 270 So. 3d 558 (Stamm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stamm v. State, 270 So. 3d 558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because Appellant was extradited to Ohio, his underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot and the appeal is dismissed. See Young v. State , 104 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (unpublished disposition) (dismissing appeal, holding the fact that the defendant *559was extradited rendered his underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus moot); see also M.M. v. Wood , 152 So. 3d 1280, 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (concluding that "while the issue [of first impression] may conceivably recur, it will not necessarily evade review if it does so" and declining "to exercise our jurisdiction to address a question that has been rendered moot by petitioner's release from secure detention").

DISMISSED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because Appellant was extradited to Ohio, his underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot and the appeal is dismissed. See Young v. State , 104 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (unpublished disposition) (dismissing appeal, holding the fact that the defendant *559was extradited rendered his underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus moot); see also M.M. v. Wood , 152 So. 3d 1280, 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (concluding that "while the issue [of first impression] may conceivably recur, it will not necessarily evade review if it does so" and declining "to exercise our jurisdiction to address a question that has been rendered moot by petitioner's release from secure detention").

DISMISSED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 So. 3d 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamm-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack