Stamey v. Hill

39 S.E. 949, 114 Ga. 154, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 614
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 8, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 S.E. 949 (Stamey v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stamey v. Hill, 39 S.E. 949, 114 Ga. 154, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 614 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

A city court can not lawfully try upon its merits a case which has been appealed from a justice’s court to a superior court; and when such a case is for any reason entered upon the docket of a city court, its only proper course is to strike the same therefrom. Kirkman v. Gillespie, 112 Ga. 507. As was ruled in that case, “ When a trial court, in a case over which it has, as to subject-matter, no jurisdiction, renders therein any judgment ex[155]*155cept one of dismissal, this court will reverse the same whether exception to it for want of jurisdiction in the court below be taken in the bill of exceptions or not.”

Submitted October 9, Decided November 8, 1901. ■ Complaint. Before Judge Jones. City court of Clarkesvillé. May 22, 1901. J. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error.

Judgment reversed, with direction.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDaniel v. Selman
42 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E. 949, 114 Ga. 154, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamey-v-hill-ga-1901.