Stamell & Schager LLP v. Dubinin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stamell & Schager LLP v. Dubinin

103 A.D.3d 518, 959 N.Y.S.2d 434

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 2013·Published

Opinion

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered December 23, 2011, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff law firm fees with interest, costs and disbursements in the total amount of $32,523.02, unanimously affirmed, without cost.

Defendant does not challenge the terms of the retainer agreement, that the work was performed, or the reasonableness of the time expended by plaintiff in representing defendant in the underlying action. His arguments on appeal are unavailing as well as unpreserved and/or unsupported by the record. Concur— Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered December 23, 2011, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff law firm fees with interest, costs and disbursements in the total amount of $32,523.02, unanimously affirmed, without cost.

Defendant does not challenge the terms of the retainer agreement, that the work was performed, or the reasonableness of the time expended by plaintiff in representing defendant in the underlying action. His arguments on appeal are unavailing as well as unpreserved and/or unsupported by the record. Concur— Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Stamell & Schager LLP v. Dubinin, 103 A.D.3d 518, 959 N.Y.S.2d 434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

103 A.D.3d 518 (Stamell & Schager LLP v. Dubinin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.