Stambler v. Walsh
This text of 219 A.D. 732 (Stambler v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Richmond county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. The presumption arising from the registration of this ear, pursuant to section 282 of the Highway Law, in the name of Samuel Caven (McCann v. Davison, 145 App. Div. 522; Ferris v. Sterling, 214 N. Y. 249; Bogorad v. Dix, 176 App. Div. 774) was overcome by the uneontradicted proof that plaintiff purchased this ear and was the owner of it at the time of the trial. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stambler-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1927.