Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc.
This text of Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc. (Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
LEON STAMBLER, Appellant
v.
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellee ______________________
2017-1272 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2015- 00044. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
BRENT N. BUMGARDNER, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS CECIL; ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL.
ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT C. SCHEINFELD, CHRISTOPHER PATRICK, New York, NY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stambler-v-mastercard-international-inc-cafc-2017.