Stambaugh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stambaugh v. State

1933 OK CR 99, 25 P.2d 1016, 55 Okla. Crim. 60, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 15, 1933

DocketNo. A-8558.

StatusPublished

This text of 1933 OK CR 99 (Stambaugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stambaugh v. State, 1933 OK CR 99, 25 P.2d 1016, 55 Okla. Crim. 60, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40 (Okla. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of receiving stolen property, and his punishment fixed at a term of one year in the state penitentiary.

The appeal is by transcript. Judgment was rendered on October 4, 1932, and the- appeal was lodged in this court on April 3, 1933. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed.

No reason to interfere with the judgment appears.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of receiving stolen property, and his punishment fixed at a term of one year in the state penitentiary.

The appeal is by transcript. Judgment was rendered on October 4, 1932, and the- appeal was lodged in this court on April 3, 1933. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed.

No reason to interfere with the judgment appears.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1933 OK CR 99, 25 P.2d 1016, 55 Okla. Crim. 60, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stambaugh-v-state-oklacrimapp-1933.