Stam v. Johnson

23 P.2d 1118, 173 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 1001
Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1933·No. No. 23879. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ON REHEARING.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, the court adheres to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, and reported in170 Wn. 534, 17 P.2d 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stam v. Johnson, 23 P.2d 1118, 173 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 1001 (Wash. 1933).

23 P.2d 1118 (Stam v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dugan
979 P.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1999)
Housing Authority v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
753 P.2d 1005 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1988)
State v. Boren
253 P.2d 939 (Washington Supreme Court, 1953)
In Re Lefevre
113 P.2d 1014 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
LeFevre v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
9 Wash. 2d 145 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Hodge v. Truax
51 P.2d 357 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)
Rose v. Superior Court
35 P.2d 605 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)