Stalnaker v. State
121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 195
This text of 121 S.E. 712 (Stalnaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stalnaker v. State, 121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 195 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial complains that the verdict of guilty
was not authorized by the evidence. There is some evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, which conviction has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalnaker-v-state-gactapp-1924.