Stalnaker v. State.

171 So. 226, 126 Fla. 407, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1615
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 171 So. 226 (Stalnaker v. State.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stalnaker v. State., 171 So. 226, 126 Fla. 407, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1615 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Order.

Per Curiam.

J. T. Hammock, Sr., was tried with Wilson Stalnaker and Nathan Prayther for the murder of W. C. Harris in Hamilton County. Hammock was convicted of murder in the first degree with recommendation to mercy. He has taken writ of error to the judgment of conviction and moves for bail pending the disposition of his case in this Court.

Section 9 of the Bill of Rights provides that all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great.

This provision of the Constitution has reference to bail sought prior to indictment and trial. After trial and conviction the matter of granting bail, as does a supersedeas, rests in the discretion of the trial court to be determined by the evidence and the facts in the case. Ex parte McDaniel, 86 Fla. 145, 97 So. 317.

The bill of exceptions has been examined and while we here express no opinion as to the probative force of the evidence, we are confident that the circumstances warrant favorable consideration of the application for bail which is hereby granted conditioned on the posting of bond in the sum of $5,000.00 to be approved by the Sheriff of Hamilton County.

*409 It is ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowe v. State
417 So. 2d 981 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Rowe v. State
394 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Flowers
330 A.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1974)
Hedden v. State
275 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Greene v. State
238 So. 2d 296 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Hoskins v. State
217 So. 2d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Brooks v. State
172 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Lambert v. State
151 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
De Coningh v. City of Daytona Beach
103 So. 2d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Floyd v. State
79 So. 2d 778 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Cash v. State
73 So. 2d 903 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Ex Parte Hyde
192 So. 159 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 So. 226, 126 Fla. 407, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalnaker-v-state-fla-1936.