Stalnaker v. State

136 So. 318, 102 Fla. 638
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 136 So. 318 (Stalnaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stalnaker v. State, 136 So. 318, 102 Fla. 638 (Fla. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J.J., concur. *639 Brown and Davis, J.J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Ruskin
126 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
In Re Petition of Leo Stalnaker for Reinstatement
9 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 318, 102 Fla. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalnaker-v-state-fla-1931.