Stalnaker v. State

136 So. 318, 102 Fla. 638
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 29, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J.J., concur. *639 Brown and Davis, J.J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stalnaker v. State, 136 So. 318, 102 Fla. 638 (Fla. 1931).

136 So. 318 (Stalnaker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Ruskin
126 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
In Re Petition of Leo Stalnaker for Reinstatement
9 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)