Stallworth v. Majors
This text of 467 F. App'x 174 (Stallworth v. Majors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Douglas Stallworth appeals the district court’s orders dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stallworth v. Majors, No. 7:11-cv-00389-JPJ-RSB, 2011 WL 5005316 (W.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2011) & (Nov. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallworth-v-majors-ca4-2012.