Stallworth v. Hertz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stallworth v. Hertz

117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 288

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1923

Docket14197

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 467 (Stallworth v. Hertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stallworth v. Hertz, 117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The refusal of the court to dismiss the petition, upon the ground that the description of the property sought to be recovered was insufficient and fatally defective for an action in bail trover, was not error. .

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new. trial shows harmful error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodicorth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The refusal of the court to dismiss the petition, upon the ground that the description of the property sought to be recovered was insufficient and fatally defective for an action in bail trover, was not error. .

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new. trial shows harmful error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodicorth, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 467, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallworth-v-hertz-gactapp-1923.