Stallo v. State

578 S.W.3d 860
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 30, 2019
DocketWD 82099; C/w WD 82100
StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 860 (Stallo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stallo v. State, 578 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per curiam:

Frank J. Stallo appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion which claimed that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate bank transactions that could have been exculpatory. Because trial counsel's performance was not deficient and no prejudice was established in any event, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 S.W.3d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallo-v-state-moctapp-2019.