Stallings v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stallings v. State

1929 OK CR 559, 283 P. 584, 45 Okla. Crim. 411, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 562

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 21, 1929

DocketNo. A-6387.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 559 (Stallings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stallings v. State, 1929 OK CR 559, 283 P. 584, 45 Okla. Crim. 411, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 562 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of maintaining and operating a public nuisance, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 90 days.

A transcript of the proceedings had in the case was filed in this court on the 22d day of September, 1926. The defendant filed no brief in support of his petition in error. The transcript does not contain any of the evidence taken in the case. It appears from an examination of the record that all the proceedings were legal and regular, and that the errors complained of are without merit.

For the reasons stated the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of maintaining and operating a public nuisance, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 90 days.

A transcript of the proceedings had in the case was filed in this court on the 22d day of September, 1926. The defendant filed no brief in support of his petition in error. The transcript does not contain any of the evidence taken in the case. It appears from an examination of the record that all the proceedings were legal and regular, and that the errors complained of are without merit.

For the reasons stated the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 559, 283 P. 584, 45 Okla. Crim. 411, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallings-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.