Stallings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stallings v. State

323 S.W.3d 819, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278, 2010 WL 3629595

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. No. WD 71751·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Stallings appeals from the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment, which sought to reopen proceedings on his motion for post-conviction relief following his conviction for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Stallings appeals from the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment, which sought to reopen proceedings on his motion for post-conviction relief following his conviction for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Stallings v. State, 323 S.W.3d 819, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278, 2010 WL 3629595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 819 (Stallings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.