Stallings v. State

110 S.E. 417, 27 Ga. App. 607, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 302
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1921
Docket12697
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 417 (Stallings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stallings v. State, 110 S.E. 417, 27 Ga. App. 607, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds; the evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and the finding of the jury was approved by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 417, 27 Ga. App. 607, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallings-v-state-gactapp-1921.