Stallings v. Stallings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stallings v. Stallings

463 S.W.3d 456, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 347, 2015 WL 1476840

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·No. WD 77343·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Ray Edward Stallings, II appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Tif-fane Loxterman sole legal and sole physical custody of the parties’ daughter and granting Stallings supervised visitation. Stallings argues that the trial court erred in entering its judgment because the evidence presented at trial did not demonstrate a substantial change of circumstances. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Ray Edward Stallings, II appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Tif-fane Loxterman sole legal and sole physical custody of the parties’ daughter and granting Stallings supervised visitation. Stallings argues that the trial court erred in entering its judgment because the evidence presented at trial did not demonstrate a substantial change of circumstances. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Stallings v. Stallings, 463 S.W.3d 456, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 347, 2015 WL 1476840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

463 S.W.3d 456 (Stallings v. Stallings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.