Stallings v. Occidental Life Insurance

58 S.E.2d 716, 231 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 374
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 19, 1950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was here at Fall Term, 1948, (229 N.C. 529, 50 S.E. 2d 292), and again at Spring Term, 1949, (230 N.C. 304, 53 S.E. 2d 90). It was held on both former appeals that the conflicting •evidence presented a case for the jury on the determinative issue whether the policy was delivered absolutely or for the purpose of inspection only. This question was submitted to the jury on substantially the same evi-•denee as that heretofore offered, in a charge free from prejudicial error, .and answered in favor of the plaintiff.

We see no compelling reason to disturb the result.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stallings v. Occidental Life Insurance, 58 S.E.2d 716, 231 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 374 (N.C. 1950).

58 S.E.2d 716 (Stallings v. Occidental Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piedmont Supply Co. v. Rozzell
70 S.E.2d 677 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)