Stallings v. Melvin

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama
DecidedDecember 2, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-00780
StatusUnknown

This text of Stallings v. Melvin (Stallings v. Melvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stallings v. Melvin, (M.D. Ala. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIJO STALLINGS, ) individually and as legal ) guardian of Anthony N. ) Stallings, an incompetent, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:20cv780-MHT ) (WO) DILLON MELVIN, ) ) Defendant. )

JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered today, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1) The parties’ proposed settlement of Marijo Stallings’s claims, brought on behalf of her son Anthony N. Stallings, is approved. Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff Marijo Stallings as legal guardian of Anthony Stallings, an incompetent, and against defendant Dillon Melvin, in the amount of $ 60,000. The court finds the terms of the settlement to be fair, just, and reasonable and in the best interest of Anthony Stallings. (2) Plaintiff Marijo Stallings’s attorneys, Mike

Crow and Kent Winingham, are entitled to an attorney’s fee in the amount of $ 21,000, which shall be satisfied out of the judgment awarded to the plaintiff. The court finds that the attorney fee is reasonable under Peebles

v. Miley, 439 So. 2d 137 (Ala. 1983), and has been duly earned by counsel. The attorneys also incurred $ 2,212.02 in expenses for the case, which shall also be satisfied out of the judgment awarded to the

plaintiff. Lastly, Anthem shall be paid for its lien maintained on any settlement of the claims, which counsel were able to get reduced to $ 929.64. (3) The remaining net settlement proceeds of

$ 35,858.34 shall be placed into the escrow account of one of plaintiff Marijo Stallings’s counsel pending the establishment of a Special Needs Trust for Anthony

Stallings. The trust shall be opened by and through 2 his mother, natural and legal guardian, and next friend, Marijo Stallings. (4) The fees and expenses of the court-appointed

guardian ad litem, Honorable Karen Mastin Laneaux, are to be paid by defendant Melvin, and not from the amount of the settlement that Anthony Stallings is to receive. The court assumes that the guardian ad litem and

defense counsel will make appropriate arrangements for the payment of her fees and expenses forthwith. (5) Upon payment of the settlement proceeds and approval by this court of the settlement for Anthony

Stallings, defendant Melvin shall have discharged his obligations under the settlement and shall be discharged and released from any further liability as to Anthony Stallings arising out of the accident that

is the basis of this lawsuit. All claims that were, or possibly could have been, asserted by Anthony Stallings against defendant Melvin are hereby merged in this

judgment and forever barred. 3 No costs are taxed. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 2nd day of December, 2021.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peebles v. Miley
439 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stallings v. Melvin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stallings-v-melvin-almd-2021.