Stalling v. Ault
194 S.E.2d 110, 229 Ga. 715, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 748
Opinion
In his pro se petition for grant of writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court, after hearing evidence, found that his court appointed attorney "conducted a very adequate investigation and very capably and properly represented the petitioner at the trial of this case,” denied the relief prayed and remanded him to the custody of the respondent. The appeal is from that judgment. The evidence supports the finding of the court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stalling v. Ault, 194 S.E.2d 110, 229 Ga. 715, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 748 (Ga. 1972).
194 S.E.2d 110 (Stalling v. Ault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stalling v. State
200 S.E.2d 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)