Stalling v. Ault
This text of 194 S.E.2d 110 (Stalling v. Ault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In his pro se petition for grant of writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court, after hearing evidence, found that his court appointed attorney "conducted a very adequate investigation and very capably and properly represented the petitioner at the trial of this case,” denied the relief prayed and remanded him to the custody of the respondent. The appeal is from that judgment. The evidence supports the finding of the court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 S.E.2d 110, 229 Ga. 715, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalling-v-ault-ga-1972.