Stallcup v. Tacoma
165 U.S. 719, 17 S. Ct. 998, 41 L. Ed. 1185, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2008
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Newport Light Co. v. Newport, 151 U. S. 527; Gormley v. Clark, 134 U. S. 338 ; Marchant v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 153 U. S. 380 ; Leeper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 462; Totea Central Railway v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; and other cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stallcup v. Tacoma, 165 U.S. 719, 17 S. Ct. 998, 41 L. Ed. 1185, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2008 (1897).
165 U.S. 719 (Stallcup v. Tacoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gormley v. Clark
134 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Leeper v. Texas
139 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Newport Light Co. v. Newport
151 U.S. 527 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Marchant v. Pennsylyania Railroad
153 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa
160 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1896)