Stalikas v. United Materials, L.L.C.

306 A.D.2d 812, 760 N.Y.S.2d 709
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stalikas v. United Materials, L.L.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 A.D.2d 810
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2003·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Dillon, J.), entered January 10, 2002, upon a jury verdict rendered in favor of defendants United Materials, L.L.C. and James Pierce.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Stalikas v United Materials (306 AD2d 810 [2003] [decided herewith]).

All concur except Wisner, J.P., and Gorski, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting memorandum as in Stalikas v United Materials (306 AD2d 810 [2003] [decided herewith]). Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stalikas v. United Materials, L.L.C., 306 A.D.2d 812, 760 N.Y.S.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 812 (Stalikas v. United Materials, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stalikas v. United Materials, L.L.C.
306 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)