Stalikas v. Ocampos

255 A.D.2d 938, 679 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12174
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Nancy E. Nathan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is an issue of fact whether Nathan’s conduct in signaling defendant Sandra Ocampos to pull her vehicle in front of Nathan’s vehicle was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff Stephen Stalikas, Jr., or whether the conduct of Ocampos was a superseding cause of those injuries (see, Barber v Merchant, 180 AD2d 984, 986-987; cf., Valdez v Bernard, 123 AD2d 351). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stalikas v. Ocampos, 255 A.D.2d 938, 679 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 938 (Stalikas v. Ocampos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shapiro v. Mangio
259 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)