Stalikas v. Ocampos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stalikas v. Ocampos

255 A.D.2d 938, 679 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12174

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 938 (Stalikas v. Ocampos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stalikas v. Ocampos, 255 A.D.2d 938, 679 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Nancy E. Nathan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is an issue of fact whether Nathan’s conduct in signaling defendant Sandra Ocampos to pull her vehicle in front of Nathan’s vehicle was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff Stephen Stalikas, Jr., or whether the conduct of Ocampos was a superseding cause of those injuries (see, Barber v Merchant, 180 AD2d 984, 986-987; cf., Valdez v Bernard, 123 AD2d 351). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Nancy E. Nathan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is an issue of fact whether Nathan’s conduct in signaling defendant Sandra Ocampos to pull her vehicle in front of Nathan’s vehicle was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff Stephen Stalikas, Jr., or whether the conduct of Ocampos was a superseding cause of those injuries (see, Barber v Merchant, 180 AD2d 984, 986-987; cf., Valdez v Bernard, 123 AD2d 351). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 938, 679 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalikas-v-ocampos-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack