Staley v. State
This text of 361 S.E.2d 702 (Staley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant pled guilty to and was sentenced for the offenses of driving under the influence of alcohol, driving while his license was in suspension, and speeding. Some 13 months later, he filed a “motion to change judgment” with respect to the conviction of driving while his license was in suspension, contending that he had entered his plea of guilty to that offense inadvertently, believing the charge was to be nolle prossed. The trial judge treated this pleading as a motion to withdraw the plea and denied it based on the fact that the term in which the sentence had been entered had already expired. This appeal followed. Held:
OCGA § 17-7-93 (b) permits a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea as a matter of right before sentence is pronounced. Even after sentencing, the trial court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of the plea prior to the expiration of the term of court in which the sentence was entered. State v. Kight, 175 Ga. App. 65 (332 SE2d 363) (1985). However, after the expiration of that term and of the time for filing an appeal from the conviction, the only remedy available to the defendant would be through habeas corpus proceedings. Id. The de *403 nial of the motion filed by the appellant in the present case must accordingly be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 S.E.2d 702, 184 Ga. App. 402, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staley-v-state-gactapp-1987.