Staley v. Kreinbihl

89 N.E.2d 593, 85 Ohio App. 510, 56 Ohio Law. Abs. 250, 40 Ohio Op. 414, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 733
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1949·No. 376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By FESS, J.

On November 6, 1948, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from this court to the Supreme Court of Ohio from a judgment entered in this court after a trial de novo herein. On the same day, but after the filing of plaintiff’s notice of appeal, the defendants filed a notice of cross-appeal in this court to the Supreme Court. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike the notice of cross-appeal from the files for the reason that no statute *251 or rule of this court provides for the filing and perfecting of cross-appeals from this court to the Supreme Court. However, the right of appeal can be determined only by the court or tribunal to which the appeal is sought to be taken. State ex rel. Cleveland, A. & C. Ry. Co. v. Glasgo, Aud., 105 Oh St, 225, 137 N. E., 35. The motion to strike is therefore overruled without prejudice to the plaintiff to raise the question in the Supreme Court.

Motion overruled.

CONN, PJ, and CARPENTER, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staley v. Kreinbihl, 89 N.E.2d 593, 85 Ohio App. 510, 56 Ohio Law. Abs. 250, 40 Ohio Op. 414, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).

89 N.E.2d 593 (Staley v. Kreinbihl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Middleton v. Huntington National Bank
156 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)