Staley v. Harmon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2004
Docket04-6284
StatusUnpublished

This text of Staley v. Harmon (Staley v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staley v. Harmon, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6284

DANIEL STALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARMON, Mental Health Counselor at Kirkland Correctional Institution R&E Center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-3390-9-23)

Submitted: June 16, 2004 Decided: June 23, 2004

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Staley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Daniel Staley appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Staley v.

Harmon, No. CA-03-3390-9-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Staley v. Harmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staley-v-harmon-ca4-2004.