Staley v. Harmon
This text of Staley v. Harmon (Staley v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6284
DANIEL STALEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HARMON, Mental Health Counselor at Kirkland Correctional Institution R&E Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-3390-9-23)
Submitted: June 16, 2004 Decided: June 23, 2004
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Staley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Daniel Staley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Staley v.
Harmon, No. CA-03-3390-9-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Staley v. Harmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staley-v-harmon-ca4-2004.