Staley v. Barhite

2 Cai. Cas. 221, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 394
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ostrander submitted that the judgment obtained against the now plaintiff, by the present defendants, ought to be reversed: 1. Because the wife was joined in the action below, which was assumpsit, without showing how she had any interest; 2. Because it appeared from the record, that a person not a constable was sworn to attend the jury; and for these reasons the judgment was accordingly reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staley v. Barhite, 2 Cai. Cas. 221, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 394 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 221 (Staley v. Barhite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mann v. Marsh
35 Barb. 68 (New York Supreme Court, 1861)
Thorne v. Dillingham
1 Denio 254 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1845)