Stalcup v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Stalcup v. State

289 S.W. 72

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stalcup v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 Tex. Crim. 415 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 3, 1926·No. No. 10205·Published

Opinions

MORROW, P. J.

The original opinion filed herein is withdrawn, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted:

Appellant was charged, tried and convicted in the corporation court of the city of Port Arthur of the offense of making an obscene and indecent exposure of his person, and against him was assessed a fine of $25.

■Upon the authority of the opinion in the case of Loraine King v. State (No. 10208) 289 S. W. 69, this day decided, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The original opinion filed herein is withdrawn, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted:

Appellant was charged, tried and convicted in the corporation court of the city of Port Arthur of the offense of making an obscene and indecent exposure of his person, and against him was assessed a fine of $25.

■Upon the authority of the opinion in the case of Loraine King v. State (No. 10208) 289 S. W. 69, this day decided, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Stalcup v. State, 289 S.W. 72 (Tex. 1926).

Pincite

289 S.W. 72 (Stalcup v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related