Stalcup v. Cameron Ditch Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Stalcup v. Cameron Ditch Co.

300 P.2d 522, 130 Mont. 625, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 41

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 14, 1956

DocketNo. 9702

StatusPublished

This text of 300 P.2d 522 (Stalcup v. Cameron Ditch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stalcup v. Cameron Ditch Co., 300 P.2d 522, 130 Mont. 625, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 41 (Mo. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is ordered: That the order of the District Court denying injunctive relief to the plaintiffs and appellants Juanita Davis Stalcup and Clancy R. Stalcup be set aside, vacated and reversed; that the cause be remanded to the district court with directions to issue a temporary injunction in the usual form restraining and enjoining the defendants and respondents from the commission of any of the acts specified in the complaint on file in the district court pending the trial and final determination of the cause therein. Said injunction to be issued by said district court upon the filing therein within ten days from the date of this order, of a good and sufficient undertaking on the part of plaintiffs and appellants in the penal sum of $5000, conditioned in accordance with the provisions of R.C.M. 1947, section 93-4207, and that such undertaking be duly approved by the trial court or a judge presiding therein.

It is further ordered that until compliance with this order by the district court, the injunction heretofore issued out of this court continue in full force and effect.

Remittitur will issue forthwith and written opinion will follow.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is ordered: That the order of the District Court denying injunctive relief to the plaintiffs and appellants Juanita Davis Stalcup and Clancy R. Stalcup be set aside, vacated and reversed; that the cause be remanded to the district court with directions to issue a temporary injunction in the usual form restraining and enjoining the defendants and respondents from the commission of any of the acts specified in the complaint on file in the district court pending the trial and final determination of the cause therein. Said injunction to be issued by said district court upon the filing therein within ten days from the date of this order, of a good and sufficient undertaking on the part of plaintiffs and appellants in the penal sum of $5000, conditioned in accordance with the provisions of R.C.M. 1947, section 93-4207, and that such undertaking be duly approved by the trial court or a judge presiding therein.

It is further ordered that until compliance with this order by the district court, the injunction heretofore issued out of this court continue in full force and effect.

Remittitur will issue forthwith and written opinion will follow.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 P.2d 522, 130 Mont. 625, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalcup-v-cameron-ditch-co-mont-1956.