Stairs v. Quincy
This text of 27 A.2d 911 (Stairs v. Quincy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
General Motion for a new trial in an action of negligence.
The evidence brought forward warrants the finding that as plaintiff, on February 6,1941, drove his automobile along the right lane of State Street in Bangor, the defendant, although he observed his approach, entered the highway with his car from a connecting private road without yielding the right of way as required by Section 8, Chapter 29, R. S. It not being made to appear that the finding of the jury, indicated by their verdict, that the negligence of the defendant was the sole proximate cause of the collision which resulted was manifestly wrong or that the damages were excessive the mandate is,
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.2d 911, 139 Me. 133, 1942 Me. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stairs-v-quincy-me-1942.