Stahlhuth v. Stahlhuth

412 S.W.3d 359, 2013 WL 4574898, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 973
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 27, 2013·No. No. ED 98861·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William R. Stahlhuth appeals from the trial court’s Amended Findings, Conclusions and Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage dissolving his marriage to Lisa A. Stahlhuth. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stahlhuth v. Stahlhuth, 412 S.W.3d 359, 2013 WL 4574898, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

412 S.W.3d 359 (Stahlhuth v. Stahlhuth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ulreich v. Kreutz
876 S.W.2d 726 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)