Stahlheber v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, LTEE

868 N.E.2d 676, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1421
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 2007
Docket2007-0257
StatusPublished

This text of 868 N.E.2d 676 (Stahlheber v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, LTEE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stahlheber v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, LTEE, 868 N.E.2d 676, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-06-134, 2006-Ohio-7034. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On February 20, 2007, appellant filed a notice of pending motion to certify a conflict. Whereas appellant has not notified this court of the decision on the pending motion to certify a conflict,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stahlheber v. Quebec, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)
2006 Ohio 7034 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 N.E.2d 676, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stahlheber-v-lac-damiante-du-quebec-ltee-ohio-2007.