Stahl v. Youchan Rhee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stahl v. Youchan Rhee

283 A.D.2d 567, 725 N.Y.S.2d 210, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 567 (Stahl v. Youchan Rhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stahl v. Youchan Rhee, 283 A.D.2d 567, 725 N.Y.S.2d 210, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered September 1, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against her, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, the preliminary interrogatory submitted to the jury was proper, since the evidence did not support any other theory of liability against the defendants (see, Fridenberger v Modayil, 268 AD2d 457). Bracken, P. J., O’Brien, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered September 1, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against her, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, the preliminary interrogatory submitted to the jury was proper, since the evidence did not support any other theory of liability against the defendants (see, Fridenberger v Modayil, 268 AD2d 457). Bracken, P. J., O’Brien, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 567, 725 N.Y.S.2d 210, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stahl-v-youchan-rhee-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack