Stahl v. Sommer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stahl v. Sommer

66 S.E. 803, 7 Ga. App. 308, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 253

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1910

Docket2002

StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.E. 803 (Stahl v. Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stahl v. Sommer, 66 S.E. 803, 7 Ga. App. 308, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 253 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. In an action of trover to recover possession of a diaznozid ring, where the issue made by the evidence was whether the plaintiff had title to the ring, or had advanced to the defendant the money with which to purchase the ring, it was not error for the court to instruct the jury, in effect, that if they believed the latter to be the truth, the plaintiff’s remedy would be a suit for the mozzey advanced, azzd not a suit for the ring.

2. The evidezzce fully supports the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. In an action of trover to recover possession of a diaznozid ring, where the issue made by the evidence was whether the plaintiff had title to the ring, or had advanced to the defendant the money with which to purchase the ring, it was not error for the court to instruct the jury, in effect, that if they believed the latter to be the truth, the plaintiff’s remedy would be a suit for the mozzey advanced, azzd not a suit for the ring.

2. The evidezzce fully supports the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 S.E. 803, 7 Ga. App. 308, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stahl-v-sommer-gactapp-1910.