Stahl v. HIALEAH HOSPITAL

82 So. 3d 954, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246, 2011 WL 3341476
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 2011
Docket1D11-3841
StatusPublished

This text of 82 So. 3d 954 (Stahl v. HIALEAH HOSPITAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stahl v. HIALEAH HOSPITAL, 82 So. 3d 954, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246, 2011 WL 3341476 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Pino v. Dist. Court of Appeal, Third Dist., 604 So.2d 1232, 1233 (Fla.1992) (“Mandamus is an appropriate legal remedy where the petitioner has a clear legal right to the performance of a particular duty and has no other legal method for obtaining relief.”).

WOLF, DAVIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pino v. District Court of Appeal, Third District
604 So. 2d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 3d 954, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246, 2011 WL 3341476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stahl-v-hialeah-hospital-fladistctapp-2011.