Stahl v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Stahl v. Goldman

448 A.2d 637, 302 Pa. Super. 280, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4751

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 23, 1982

DocketNo. 200

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 448 A.2d 637 (Stahl v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stahl v. Goldman, 448 A.2d 637, 302 Pa. Super. 280, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4751 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellee filed suit in assumpsit against appellant seeking to recover on an alleged oral guaranty. The court below found appellant liable in the amount of $5,000.00. Thereafter appellant filed a notice of appeal. The trial court directed appellant to file a statement of matters complained of on appeal. After such statement was filed the court issued its opinion.

Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1038(d) requires that exceptions to a court’s decision be filed within ten days of the decision. Matters not covered by exceptions are deemed waived. Here appellant has failed to file exceptions, therefore we must quash the appeal. Van Ameringen v. Arcadia Company, Inc., 299 Pa.Superior Ct. 444, 445 A.2d 837 (1982); Matczak v. Matczak, 275 Pa.Superior Ct. 164, 418 A.2d 663 (1980).

Appeal quashed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellee filed suit in assumpsit against appellant seeking to recover on an alleged oral guaranty. The court below found appellant liable in the amount of $5,000.00. Thereafter appellant filed a notice of appeal. The trial court directed appellant to file a statement of matters complained of on appeal. After such statement was filed the court issued its opinion.

Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1038(d) requires that exceptions to a court’s decision be filed within ten days of the decision. Matters not covered by exceptions are deemed waived. Here appellant has failed to file exceptions, therefore we must quash the appeal. Van Ameringen v. Arcadia Company, Inc., 299 Pa.Superior Ct. 444, 445 A.2d 837 (1982); Matczak v. Matczak, 275 Pa.Superior Ct. 164, 418 A.2d 663 (1980).

Appeal quashed with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 A.2d 637, 302 Pa. Super. 280, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stahl-v-goldman-pasuperct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack