Staggers v. State

162 S.E.2d 737, 118 Ga. App. 97, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 916
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1968
Docket43696
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 162 S.E.2d 737 (Staggers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staggers v. State, 162 S.E.2d 737, 118 Ga. App. 97, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 916 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where the appellant fails to appeal from the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial, the judgment and rulings on the motion for a new trial become the law of the case as to the grounds of the motion. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (161 SE2d 281); Crowley v. State, 118 Ga. App. 7.

Under the authorities cited the judgment on the verdict is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Staggers v. State
165 S.E.2d 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Davis v. State
163 S.E.2d 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. Jackson
162 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E.2d 737, 118 Ga. App. 97, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staggers-v-state-gactapp-1968.