Stafford v. Warner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-40464·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40464

Conference Calendar

JAMES BERNARD STAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CLIFTON E. WARNER, TENIE F. WOODARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-980

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* This is an appeal from the magistrate judge's dismissal of appellant's civil rights action as frivolous. Appellant argues that there was no evidence to support the disciplinary action taken against him by the disciplinary board. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Stafford v. Warner, No. 6:94-CV-980 (E.D. Tex. May 4, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. Warner, (5th Cir. 1996).

Stafford v. Warner (Stafford v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.