Stafford v. Trimble
This text of 4 Ky. 323 (Stafford v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION of the Court, by
B0YLE.-.-.This was an action upon a covenant to convey land on request. The only objection relied on is, that there is no precise and particular request, with a certain day, alleged in the declaration.
The want of an averment of a request to convey on a day certain, is deemed by the court fatally erroneous. Whenever an action accrues on a demand or request, the time as well as the place of the demand or request ought to be alleged so certainly and precisely that it may be traversed. In such cases the common averment of " sa?pe requ~s~tus," is not sufficient
Judgment reversed.
According Worley versus Mourning, ante. 254.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ky. 323, 1 Bibb 323, 1809 Ky. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-trimble-kyctapp-1809.