Stafford v. Todd Shipyards Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stafford v. Todd Shipyards Corp.

242 A.D. 667

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D. 667 (Stafford v. Todd Shipyards Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stafford v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 242 A.D. 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion for leave to serve an amended answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In oUr opinion, the respondent was guilty of gross laches in making this motion, and its granting was, therefore, an abuse of discretion. (Luback v. Hirsch, 232 App. Div. 691.) Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion for leave to serve an amended answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In oUr opinion, the respondent was guilty of gross laches in making this motion, and its granting was, therefore, an abuse of discretion. (Luback v. Hirsch, 232 App. Div. 691.) Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-todd-shipyards-corp-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack