Stafford v. State

115 S.E. 152, 29 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 269
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1922
Docket13992
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 152 (Stafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stafford v. State, 115 S.E. 152, 29 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 269 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the defendants with the offense charged is wholly circumstantial and does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the defendants.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. O. Ñ. King, W. E. & W. G. Mann, for plaintiffs in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 152, 29 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-state-gactapp-1922.