Stafford v. State
This text of 566 S.E.2d 663 (Stafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant Terry Joe Stafford was convicted of malice murder, possession of a knife during the commission of a crime, six counts of cruelty to children, and two counts of possession of marijuana.1 He appeals, enumerating error upon the general grounds and the admission of a statement reflecting his mood on the day in question. We find no error and affirm.
On the day in question, the victim, James Franklin Dilbeck, his [338]*338wife and children were eating lunch outside at an apartment complex. They were joined by other adults and several children. Stafford, who rented an apartment nearby, was annoying people at the complex and he was asked to leave. At that, Stafford became agitated and shouted obscenities. Soon, the victim approached Stafford and told him not to use obscenities in the presence of his children. The victim also asked Stafford to leave.
[338]*338Stafford went to his apartment for a few minutes. When he emerged he resumed shouting and then “went into a complete rage.” He continued to yell obscenities and said he had something for the victim.
The victim, who was unarmed, crossed the street and approached Stafford. They began to argue and scuffle, and the victim swatted at Stafford. In the midst of the scuffle, Stafford unveiled a knife with a five-inch blade, stabbed the victim in the chest, and ran.
The victim bled to death in front of his children. An autopsy demonstrated that the wound was consistent with an initial downward thrust of the blade, followed by an upward thrust, with force sufficient to break the blade.
Later, Stafford was arrested. At the time of his arrest, police found marijuana on his person and in his apartment.
1. The evidence was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find Stafford guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). The evidence did not demand a finding of voluntary manslaughter simply because the victim approached Stafford or swatted at him. See Anderson v. State, 248 Ga. 682, 683 (3) (285 SE2d 533) (1982) (whether provocation is sufficient to reduce the offense from murder to manslaughter is a question for the jury).
2. Stafford asserts the trial court erred in permitting a witness to testify that Stafford told him he was upset on the day in question because someone had stolen his marijuana plants. We disagree. The evidence was admissible to show Stafford’s state of mind, see Klinect v. State, 269 Ga. 570, 574 (7) (501 SE2d 810) (1998), as well as to prove the marijuana charges. It was not rendered inadmissible simply because it incidentally put Stafford’s character in issue. Ware v. State, 273 Ga. 16, 17 (2) (537 SE2d 657) (2000).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 S.E.2d 663, 275 Ga. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-state-ga-2002.