Stafford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stafford v. State

169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 845, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 303

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1933·No. No. 9246·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted and tried for the offense of murder. The jury returned a .verdict of guilty. The motion- for a new trial contains only the general grounds. The evidence shows clearly [846]*846that the verdict was authorized. The judgment refusing a new trial is therefore Affirmed.

No. 9246. April 13, 1933. W. E. Perry and W. A. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence S. Camp, attorney-general, Q. C. Bpurlin, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra. All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted and tried for the offense of murder. The jury returned a .verdict of guilty. The motion- for a new trial contains only the general grounds. The evidence shows clearly [846]*846that the verdict was authorized. The judgment refusing a new trial is therefore Affirmed.

No. 9246. April 13, 1933. W. E. Perry and W. A. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence S. Camp, attorney-general, Q. C. Bpurlin, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra. All the Justices concur.

Stafford v. State, 169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 845, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

169 S.E. 110 (Stafford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related