Stafford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stafford v. State

169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 845, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 303

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1933

DocketNo. 9246

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 110 (Stafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stafford v. State, 169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 845, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted and tried for the offense of murder. The jury returned a .verdict of guilty. The motion- for a new trial contains only the general grounds. The evidence shows clearly [846]*846that the verdict was authorized. The judgment refusing a new trial is therefore Affirmed.

No. 9246. April 13, 1933. W. E. Perry and W. A. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence S. Camp, attorney-general, Q. C. Bpurlin, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra. All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted and tried for the offense of murder. The jury returned a .verdict of guilty. The motion- for a new trial contains only the general grounds. The evidence shows clearly [846]*846that the verdict was authorized. The judgment refusing a new trial is therefore Affirmed.

No. 9246. April 13, 1933. W. E. Perry and W. A. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence S. Camp, attorney-general, Q. C. Bpurlin, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra. All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 845, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-state-ga-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack