Stafford v. State

48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 169, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 68
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1904·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Lamar, J.

1. Testimony of a witness that he had heard that, the prosecutor lost certain clothing was not inadmissible as hearsay, when offered, solely for the purpose of showing why he had carefully examined the property found in the possession of the defendant. Civil Code, § 5176.

2. There was ample evidence of the larceny from the house, and direct proof of the fact that recently thereafter the goods were found in the possession of the defendant, who made no attempt to explain how he came thereby. The verdict was demanded by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. State, 48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 169, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 68 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 903 (Stafford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. State
201 S.E.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Chubbs v. State
51 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Forbes v. State
180 S.E. 914 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Coleman v. State
158 S.E. 627 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Stewart v. State
88 S.E. 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)