Stafford v. State
This text of 48 S.E. 903 (Stafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Testimony of a witness that he had heard that, the prosecutor lost certain clothing was not inadmissible as hearsay, when offered, solely for the purpose of showing why he had carefully examined the property found in the possession of the defendant. Civil Code, § 5176.
2. There was ample evidence of the larceny from the house, and direct proof of the fact that recently thereafter the goods were found in the possession of the defendant, who made no attempt to explain how he came thereby. The verdict was demanded by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 169, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-state-ga-1904.